A comparison of direct and distance sampling methods to estimate abundance of nesting gulls
Résumé
We compared the performances of the strip transect count method and the distance
sampling method during colony surveys of large gulls to estimate the total number of nests. Ten colonies
were surveyed by both methods. Nest detection probabilities varied from 0.519 ± 0.064 to 0.706 ± 0.049
and the average nest detection probability was 0.614 ± 0.015. Nest densities were highly variable, ranging
from 77 nests/ha to 717 nests/ha. Estimates of the number of nests obtained by the strip transect count
method averaged 9.3% lower than those obtained by distance sampling but by as much as 31% in some
colonies. Underestimation by the strip transect counts increased at high nest densities (Kendall t = −0.556,
P = 0.032). The strip transect method needed on average 6.5 observers per colony surveyed, whereas
the distance sampling method required 1.4 observers per colony. In addition, the mean time spent per
colony was 3 hours vs 1.7 hours for the strip transect and distance sampling methods respectively.
Combining both these measures of effort, distance sampling required on average 87% less effort in the
field than the strip transect method. We strongly advocate the use of distance sampling for surveys of
large gull colonies.